The core problem with BTC
By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/02 13:30:01
0
Share
Homepage > News > Editorial > The core problem with BTC For many years now, I have written that BTC has become “a soft money” and attempted to warn a community I once believed in that the path of convenience, politics, and social consensus was leading them into the arms of the very systems they claimed to oppose—one where an oligarchical intelligentsia rules a new world technocracy that is more oppressive than the last. Now, in the spring of 2025, that warning is bearing (more) bitter fruit for the small blockers. A new proposal from Bitcoin Core developers seek to remove longstanding limits on the OP_RETURN function, a change that speaks volumes about the true nature of BTC in its current form and culture. And it’s not good. They say BTC doesn’t change. Right now, they’re all fighting about who gets to change it – again. — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) April 30, 2025 The proposal in question, advanced by Peter Todd, would eliminate the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN output scripts in BTC. That limit was originally imposed, if you believe the rhetoric, as a safeguard to prevent abuse, to encourage monetary uses of the protocol, and to keep node storage burdens modest. In reality, it was pushed almost exclusively by Luke Dashjr to kill off Satoshi Dice, CounterParty tokens and everyone else in 2015 who was doing cool stuff with Bitcoin. “all “standardness” rules are conceptually problematic to the very core” Almost all the standardness rules are either avoiding actual DoS attacks like excessive checksigs, or leaving room for soft fork upgrades. The DoS attacks should be fixed of course – hopefully the Great... — Peter Todd (@peterktodd) April 29, 2025 Proponents of the new change now argue that these constraints are arbitrary, outdated, or easily circumvented and that removing them merely reflects reality. But reality, as always with BTC, is contested terrain, and it’s increasingly clear that reality is whatever the High Priests of Bitcoin Core decree—which is a problem because about 99% of the BTC network is running the “Core” reference client software—a dangerous level of centralization. Bitcoin Core is completely captured. If you’re still running it (~99% of nodes are), then there’s no other way to say it – you are facilitating an ongoing attack on Bitcoin. Your use of the software is giving the attackers the power to carry out their attack. Remove that power. — Bitcoin Lebowski (@DudeJLebowski) April 29, 2025 Let’s pause to consider the architecture here. In the BTC Core world, policy changes begin life as GitHub pull requests, vetted by a small cohort of developers and eventually merged into the reference implementation. If you raise concerns—as one contributor recently did, eloquently and at length—you are told to “vote with your feet” or your hash. Or worse, you are ratioed, flagged, silenced, or dismissed. This is not decentralization. It is a bureaucracy with a command line and a direct repudiation of what Bitcoin was supposed to be. And that’s half the problem, since bad actors have taken over Bitcoin Core maintainership. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) May 1, 2025 The original vision, as Satoshi outlined and as BSV continues to uphold, is a system governed not by invisible developer councils or sacred repositories, but by the free market itself. In BSV, consensus rules are generalized and then locked such that most things are policy rules to be configured by competing node operators. Those node operators choose the rules they enforce, and users choose to connect to the nodes they trust. The balance of power is spread across competing commercial interests, not consolidated behind a single GitHub repo guarded like the Holy of Holies. Lopp was literally rubbing it in our faces that he fully intends to rape us. This isn’t just some disagreement: they are literally committing violence against Bitcoiners. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) April 30, 2025 This is the core philosophical difference: BTC is governed by a strict hierarchical committee. BSV is governed by competing market incentives of commercial operators. And it matters. When policy becomes protocol and protocol becomes ideology, Bitcoin ceases to be money and becomes a meme. This is what I mean when I say that BTC is a soft money: it is not backed by consistent rules, or by the discipline of the market. It is steered by people, subject to politics, and vulnerable to moral panics and backroom bargains. It is, in the end, a fiat money in open-source clothing that never actually becomes serious for anything except the meme itself. This is the tragedy of the Bitcoin Civil War, and it is what I’ve spent years trying to explain. Bitcoin didn’t split because of a block size dispute. It split because one side believed in the sovereignty of protocol, and the other believed in the supremacy of social consensus. One side wanted money governed by honest actors, constrained by economic incentives, and flexible as a general-purpose money, payment system and distributed database. The other wanted money that could be tinkered with endlessly by those who claimed to “understand it best” and ultimately beholden to social signalling and constant jockeying of a bizarre mix of political forces. Knots runners are censoring financial related transactions. My node therefore rejects all connections to Knots. Fuck Knots and anyone that uses it. https://t.co/rhhtfFFHYs — noosphere888 #FREESAMOURAI (@noosphere888x2) April 30, 2025 We now know where that road leads: to policy changes locked behind pull request comment freezes. To governance by insiders. To a transactional system where few actually transact. And now to a redefinition of OP_RETURN; not because of demand, not because of competition, not because of any urgent need in the market, but because a small cabal of developers decided the rule was inconvenient for their own commercial needs, and therefore, deemed into the protocol. If that doesn’t make you pause, it should. Because what happens when it’s not OP_RETURN? What happens when they decide that your privacy is too subversive, or that your scaling solution is too unorthodox, or that your coins—mined honestly, used legally—are somehow suspect because they don’t align with the evolving orthodoxy of BTC Core? Or, imagine this: what happens when Peter Todd, the architect of this latest controversy, decides it’s finally time to raise the supply cap of BTC? Can you stop him, anon? This is Peter Todd. He thinks Satoshi Nakamoto did a bad job engineering bitcoin, so when HBO doxed him, Greg Maxwell (disgraced Wikimedia mod) didn’t write a long takedown piece just hours later. Because Peter helped destroy BTC’s usefulness as cash with his RBF work, Adam... pic.twitter.com/3wDJuuglkL — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) October 9, 2024 The answer is simple: you get forked off the network. Or you get banned. Or you get ignored until your network dies. In BSV, we have chosen another path. Our network is open. Our rules are stable and predictable. Our governance is minimal and easy to understand. We welcome competition between node clients, service providers, miners, merchants, wallets, and users. And while we are not perfect, we are principled—and that’s the part that matters. The way forward is not to consolidate power further. It is to disperse it. It is to allow policy settings to compete. To let wallets and exchanges and miners decide, on the open market, what rules make sense for their own businesses. That is the path to scaling. That is the path to adoption. And that is the only path to money that is truly sound. A sound money must be hard in every sense: hard to change, hard to censor, and hard to kill. BTC has failed that test. Again. But Bitcoin, the real Bitcoin, the protocol etched into the white paper and revived in BSV, has never failed that test. Watch: Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0′′ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Source: https://coingeek.com/the-core-problem-with-btc/
You may also like
Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (July 8)
Controversy Surrounding Huawei's Prodigy Li Bojie and His DeepSeek Interview Experience Amid Web3 Investor Backlash
SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's Q3 Profit Expected to Exceed $1 Billion
Anthropic is quietly disrupting the AI commercial landscape. With the explosive popularity of Claude Code, its ARR has surged from $9 billion to over $60 billion in a single quarter, with API business gross margins exceeding 80% and net revenue retention rates reaching 500%. Research firm SemiAnalys...
From 'Never Sell Bitcoin' to Active Management: How is Strategy Coping with $1.26 Billion Annual Dividend Pressure?
Leverage Products Trigger Major Changes in Stock Market: How Did the South Korean Market Become a 'Casino'?
Bernstein Analysis: Memory Prices Are Still Rising, But Phones and PCs Can't Keep Up
Satoshi Bitcoin lawsuit drops 44 wallets after on-chain activity
Upcoming Auction of Token FOLD: What is The Interfold Supported by Vitalik?
The Demystification of AI Collaboration Tools: Is Organizing Reports and Checking Spreadsheets the Most Common Scenario?
Goldman Sachs Trading Desk: The Sell-off of Momentum Stocks in the U.S. is Fierce, Unseen Since 2020! But No 'Panic' Yet, Retail Investors are the Biggest Support
Collateral USD: How does the "second layer dollar" above stablecoins form?
Under the reference framework of the offshore dollar system, once stablecoins are incorporated into the collateral financing chain, it may give rise to a new type of dollar debt based on them—“collateralized dollars.” Whether this layer of debt can be established and whether it is stable depends on ...
How has the Pacific "fever" turned extreme weather into a cash machine for Wall Street?
The extreme weather caused by El Niño is sweeping through the commodity markets, becoming not only a "weather code" for quantitative funds and traders to frantically profit from, but also quietly driving up global food prices and the cost of living for ordinary people.
Trade Spot Market Orders With More Control: WEEX Adds Slippage Tolerance
WEEX Spot now supports Slippage tolerance for market orders, helping users set a maximum acceptable price deviation before placing a market buy or sell order
Morning Report | One week after the full implementation of the EU MiCA, 21 stablecoin issuers and over 270 crypto service providers have obtained regulatory qualifications; Microsoft lays off 4,800 employees, with Xbox accounting for about 3,200 of the...
July 7 Market Important Events Overview
Morning News | SK Hynix officially launches the marketing promotion process for its U.S. stock listing; the Central Cyberspace Administration announces the results of the first phase of rectifying AI application chaos, with over 14,000 non-compliant pr...
July 6 Market Important Events Overview
How has Binance's stock business performed in the 30 days since its launch?
Emerging market buying supported the first wave of demand.
Blockchain Capital Partner: AI is rewriting the fundamental unit of labor
The rise of AI is rewriting the basic unit of labor from "positions" and "companies" to "tasks." When programmable labor meets programmable currency, a production line without companies, salary systems, or HR becomes possible for the first time.
Can Open USD support Stripe's ambitions?
Stripe collaborates with multiple parties to launch OUSD, not only challenging the dominance of USDC but also exposing its trillion-dollar ambition to transition from a "payment interface" to a "next-generation funds settlement network."
Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (July 8)
Controversy Surrounding Huawei's Prodigy Li Bojie and His DeepSeek Interview Experience Amid Web3 Investor Backlash
SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's Q3 Profit Expected to Exceed $1 Billion
Anthropic is quietly disrupting the AI commercial landscape. With the explosive popularity of Claude Code, its ARR has surged from $9 billion to over $60 billion in a single quarter, with API business gross margins exceeding 80% and net revenue retention rates reaching 500%. Research firm SemiAnalys...
From 'Never Sell Bitcoin' to Active Management: How is Strategy Coping with $1.26 Billion Annual Dividend Pressure?
Leverage Products Trigger Major Changes in Stock Market: How Did the South Korean Market Become a 'Casino'?
Bernstein Analysis: Memory Prices Are Still Rising, But Phones and PCs Can't Keep Up
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com
